UCINA, in the maneuver financial institution the government has been forgotten about the tourist ports putting to risk job 2.200 places



UCINA Nautical Confindustria has denounced that in the law budgetary the 2019 government has been forgotten about the tourist ports putting to risk job 2.200 places. The representation of the nautical industry has express "strong disappointment for the lacked answer the government to the topic of the retroactive application - to contracts already in course - of the increase until 400% of the state property canons of the tourist ports". "In spite of the intense activity of I confront with various ministers - it has explained UCINA - the amendment parliamentarian face to close to extract the litigations of 25 tourist ports with the State is not inserted in maxi the amendment of the government, voted to the Senate, that it has entirely replaced the maneuver".

UCINA has remembered that the litigation "regards the retroactive application - to contracts already in course - of the increase until 400% of the state property canons fixed from the Prodi government in 2006. In continuity with the past - it has found the organization - it is chosen to send back a decision, necessary once again, now more than ever, to avoid the "failure of State" of the enterprises that would sweep up the 2,200 assigned of the interested harbour structures".

"In absence of a specific norm - it has still evidenced UCINA - to nothing the sentences of that and Council of State are worth of the Constitutional Court, that it has sanctioned that the canons can be increased, but not retroactive, having itself to distinguish between contracts of concession in course and those stipulated successively to the effectiveness of the increases. The Agency of the Entrances, in fact, has begun recently to demand the sums not due and first of the 25 ports in litigation already it has been seen to block the checking accounts".

Remembering that "in Italy the infrastructures of the nautical one from diporto are constructed entirely with private capitals and, to conclusion of superficial contracts of concession of the free ones, free of charge they will be devolven to the public patrimony of the State", UCINA has complained that "all this does not represent only an undue pretension of the State, to ulterior demonstration of a culture anti enterprise that are diffused in the Country, also at the level of ruling class, but not to have faced the problem represents also a removal to the damages for all the Italian nationals. Operating in this way, in fact - it has explained the association - the message that arrive strong and clear to all the investor, national and foreign countries is obvious: Italy is a Country where not there are certainties and of which us cannot be trusted. According to message of this law budgetary, strongly negative, is that for which, once again, it obtains listening only who blocks services essential publics. And also in this it is difficult to pick great changes with the past".

UCINA has concluded specifying that, in this scene, confirmation "its engagement and the prosecuzione of the action of representation and defense of all the row of the nautical one from diporto Italian, for the necessary one prosieguo of I confront with the institutions on this and on the other sensitive topics of the field".